tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777065841212380119.post2508841578573905336..comments2023-07-11T06:24:16.895-07:00Comments on chris march explains it all for you: Suck On This, OprahChris Marchhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03911854350280106056noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777065841212380119.post-46704491749432466642010-04-16T20:45:49.621-07:002010-04-16T20:45:49.621-07:00I grew up on SNL too and have watched it swing fro...I grew up on SNL too and have watched it swing from liberal to conservative and back to liberal... or maybe that was just liberal to boring and back? anyhoo, I would totally vote for Oprah.glam.spoonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14775928503157260485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777065841212380119.post-13661932333521098072010-04-11T20:03:44.668-07:002010-04-11T20:03:44.668-07:00The more I learn about you the more I like you. Go...The more I learn about you the more I like you. Good post. She is a hoot on SNL. We need to laugh at it to keep from crying with the stupidity that is the GOP. Ron Regan called her and Michelle Bauchmann a few McNuggets short of a Happy Meal. It's so ture!Zephttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03682731203511053192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777065841212380119.post-42413529417048517442010-04-11T15:06:48.601-07:002010-04-11T15:06:48.601-07:00well if she runs in 2012, oprah'd have to win ...well if she runs in 2012, oprah'd have to win the nomination of the party over the incumbent, but who're we kidding: even barack would want oprah in office, LOL.<br /><br />the SNL i grew up with was somewhat irreverent, but somewhat conciliatory as it is today. which makes sense, as in the lifespan of the show, the late 80s and 90s were a big transition. i most remember the chris farley/adam sandler/dana carvey/mike meyers et al version of the cast ~ legendary in their own way and obviously hilarious.<br /><br />even more recently, when tina was head writer, it was still somewhat funny, but seth meyers isn't really getting the job done for me. plus, the success of the show now hinges so much on celeb hosts ~ whose participation then hinges on being seen in the best possible light ~ that SNL just can't afford irreverence. sad.kayce.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14897843883929212133noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777065841212380119.post-47088401268989182592010-04-11T14:24:08.624-07:002010-04-11T14:24:08.624-07:00you said mental retardation! How refreshing to hea...you said mental retardation! How refreshing to hear olde english!Kathleen Crowleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10859382110278231302noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777065841212380119.post-45957838305050444562010-04-11T13:36:45.749-07:002010-04-11T13:36:45.749-07:00I, too, grew up with SNL. I can still name who I ...I, too, grew up with SNL. I can still name who I was talking to on the phone when I first saw Steven Martin's King Tut skit. SNL is seminal for me in terms of sarcasm and anti-populist. I have missed that about it for years. Tina Fey was right on target.<br /><br />Keep explaining it all for me...count me in as a loyal reader all ready!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1777065841212380119.post-6568192767532010262010-04-11T11:50:40.288-07:002010-04-11T11:50:40.288-07:00I agree, let's get the word out that if Sarah ...I agree, let's get the word out that if Sarah Palin is in the runnings, for everyone to write on the ballot "Oprah Winfrey" as the new president. lolBrady Thttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12158751920903157037noreply@blogger.com